The laps and decay of tradition and ritual, the violence which follows change both in the act and the action against, the modification and relativity of cultural identity based on a globalized network of communication, the illusory bridges of technology that drive us ever farther apart, absorption of cultural expressions and modalities through removed means and mediums and the projection of these components through further generations of imitation and dispora, etc, etc, etc.
Most of my artwork, ranging from screenprinting/collage, to installation, to video, and drawing, derives rather strongly from a traditional Japanese aesthetic, however one which has been molded by a western hand. To an extent this practice dwells on the legitimacy of articulating ones own relative cultural identity in a globalized society through the means and expressions of other cultures, especially by the weight of imitation. This has likely stemmed from using foreign film as a primary cultural mediator for my edification on cultural and ritual nuance (with the understanding that film is a tertiary representation at best.) A film is but a compounded manifestation of impressions of a scenario, , gestures, expressions, or culture filtered through actors, directors, cinematographers, and the medium itself. For my interests, film is also a record of the past; former actions documented by the camera, and even that these actions are imitations/suppositions of events that occurred generations past. This preoccupation with film, a medium which unfolds in time but is itself composed of a chain of static images, has bred a cinematic quality in all of my work, being that each piece bears a certain experiential quality, or that time is considered element. In that sense, particularly my installation work, bears the quality of both being the record or result of an event and also being the event itself. Film, perceived as an artifact, further influenced me to use antiquated modes (such as ukiyo-e style in my prints) and modify them with modern content and contexts, commenting on both the past and present. Though seeming static, a piece of art may carry the breath or evidence of a former action or violence, or it may bear the quality of a moment suspended in time (both active and static simultaneously).
I view my work, in part, as but an extension of the interpretive continuum, in which we absorb all the elements of the world around us (the artistic and ideological diaspora that is unstoppable, borrowed from other cultures or not) that inform upon us and our condition, and project them outward through the filter of our distinctive attitudes.